What a vertical is
Two legs, same expiry, different strikes, opposite directions. Buy the 100 call, sell the 106 call. That is a bull call spread, and it is the whole construction.
The money you receive for the leg you sold reduces what the position costs. In exchange, you have handed away everything above the higher strike.
What the cap buys you
Four things, and it is worth being precise about each because the trade-off is genuinely even.
- A lower cost. The premium collected offsets the premium paid. Here, roughly 40% cheaper.
- A closer breakeven. This is the most underrated part. The bare call needed a 4% move to break even. The spread needs 2.3%. You are right at a lower bar.
- A smaller maximum loss. The worst case falls from 4 to 2.3, in rupees, known on day one.
- A slower clock. You are paying decay on the long leg and collecting it on the short one, so the net bleed is far gentler.
What you give up is only the part above the short strike. If you were expecting a 3% move, that part was never in your forecast anyway.
A spread is not a hedged call. It is a bet with an opinion about how far attached to it — and stating that opinion is what makes it cheaper.
What it does to the greeks
Every greek shrinks, because the two legs partly cancel.
- Delta is the difference between the two legs' deltas, so a spread responds less to the underlying than a bare option. Slower to make money, slower to lose it.
- Theta nets off substantially. You still pay decay, but a fraction of what the bare call costs — which is why spreads survive sideways days that would quietly destroy a long option.
- Vega largely cancels. This is the quiet advantage: a spread is far less exposed to an IV collapse, which makes it a much more honest way to express a view around a known event.
Choosing the width
The distance between the strikes is the one real decision, and it maps directly onto how far you think the move will go.
- Narrow. Cheap, near breakeven, small maximum gain. Suits a modest move you are fairly confident about.
- Wide. Costs more, breakeven further out, larger maximum gain. Suits a big move you are less sure of.
Put the short strike where you genuinely think the move runs out — not at whatever strike happens to make the diagram look best.
Comparing two spreads on maximum gain alone. It is the least likely outcome on the diagram and therefore the least informative number on it. Compare breakevens and maximum losses first — those are the parts of the picture you will actually meet.
Read it yourself
Use the narrow spread: long 100 call, short 106 call, net premium 2.3.
- Underlying finishes at 98. What is the outcome?
- Underlying finishes at 120. What is the outcome, and what would the bare call have made?
- The underlying does not move for two weeks. Which position is in more trouble — the spread or the bare call?
Show answers
1. A loss of 2.3, the full premium. Anywhere below 100 gives the same answer — the left side is flat.
2. The spread makes 3.7 — the six-point width less the 2.3 paid. The bare call would have made 16. This is the cost of the cap, in full view, and it only bites when the move goes much further than you expected.
3. The bare call, by a wide margin. It carries the full theta of a long option. The spread is paying decay on one leg and collecting it on the other, so a fortnight of nothing costs it a fraction as much. Sideways is the condition that quietly kills long options, and it is exactly the condition a spread is built to survive.
Terms used
- Vertical spread
- Two legs, same expiry, different strikes, opposite directions.
- Debit spread
- One that costs money to open — you pay more than you collect.
- Credit spread
- One that pays you to open. Same shape, opposite side.
- Width
- Distance between the strikes. Sets both maximum gain and cost.
- Short strike
- The leg you sold. Where the gain stops growing.